Between 19 July 2025 and late August 2025, the VicPlan interface changed for 7 Cullen Court, Spotswood. In July, the dominant zone shown was TRZ2 – Transport Zone 2 (Principal Road Network) and a grey TRZ2 overlay rendered by default. In the current build, Neighbourhood Residential Zone (NRZ) is listed first and the TRZ2 overlay no longer appears by default. That ordering matters — and it’s consistent with a broader clean‑up of TRZ2 visibility on private land.
Before/After evidence
What exactly changed
- Zoning list order: NRZ now appears first for 7 Cullen Court; TRZ2 is last. Previously, TRZ2 was presented as the top/primary zone.
- Default overlay behaviour: The grey TRZ2 overlay no longer renders automatically; users must actively toggle/identify it (and that toggle is currently not working which is interesting).
- VicPlan build change: Interface shows a minor revision bump (v2.5.7 → v2.5.9) consistent with a UI/behaviour update.
Key point: Changing the display order and default overlay does not change the legal effect of zones that apply. It only changes what casual viewers see first.
Why this matters (legally & practically)
- Perception drives decision‑making: Many officers, councillors and neighbours rely on what VicPlan shows by default. If TRZ2 is buried, fewer people notice the anomaly of a transport zone on private freehold land.
- Existing Use Rights remain intact: My Section 6(3) Planning & Environment Act activation and documentation pre‑date the UI change. Display order in a web viewer cannot retrospectively extinguish rights.
- Statewide signal: When a statewide mapping tool changes how TRZ2 is presented on private parcels, it suggests central awareness of risk around historical TRZ2 applications and consent documentation.
What I think is happening
Rather than confront the core problem — TRZ2 applied to privately owned residential land and the question of required consent — the system has adjusted VicPlan’s presentation to make TRZ2 less obvious. In my view, that looks like risk management and a quiet audit.
- Audit in flight: Expect checks for the existence (or absence) of the required consent records for TRZ2 on private land.
- Narrative shift: By listing NRZ first, parties may try to argue that TRZ2 is somehow secondary. That is a presentation choice, not a legal one.
How to reproduce
- Open VicPlan and search for 7 Cullen Court, Spotswood 3015.
- Observe that the Planning Scheme Zones list shows NRZ ahead of TRZ2.
- Note that the TRZ2 grey overlay does not render by default; use the Identify tools to reveal it if needed (note - not yet working).
- Record the VicPlan version string shown in the footer for your screenshot and keep the original file (with EXIF) for integrity.
Version fingerprints & audit log
- 19 Jul 2025 – Screenshot captured with VicPlan v2.5.7. TRZ2 listed first; overlay visible by default. EXIF preserved.
- Late Aug 2025 – Screenshot captured with VicPlan v2.5.9. NRZ listed first; TRZ2 overlay hidden by default. EXIF preserved.
Reminder: Web viewer cosmetics cannot amend legal history. Zoning provenance, titles, Gazette notices and consent records decide the lawfulness — not the order of a list in an interface.
Closing note
This is how change happens: evidence → agitation → movement. If authorities are quietly re‑tuning VicPlan because one small block in Spotswood exposed a much bigger problem, that is a public‑interest win.
Last updated: 29 August 2025 • Author: Clarke Towson • Spotswood Trailers – TRZ2 Legal Project
All screenshots are originals with EXIF intact. If you cite this page, please link to the canonical URL above.